What is considered a cogent argument. Determination of a cogent argument Essay [640 Words] GradeMiners 2022-11-01
What is considered a cogent argument
A cogent argument is a well-reasoned and logical argument that presents evidence and reasoning in support of a specific conclusion. It is clear, concise, and convincing, and it effectively addresses any counterarguments or objections that might be raised.
To be considered a cogent argument, the conclusion must be supported by strong and relevant evidence. This evidence should be carefully chosen and presented in a logical way, with each piece of evidence building upon the previous one to create a cohesive and compelling case. The argument should also be structured in a clear and logical way, with each point building upon the previous one to create a cohesive and well-reasoned whole.
In addition to being well-supported and structured, a cogent argument should also be clear and concise. It should be easy for the reader or listener to understand and follow, and it should not contain any unnecessary or irrelevant information. This is important because it helps to ensure that the argument is effective in convincing the reader or listener of the conclusion.
Finally, a cogent argument should also be able to effectively address any counterarguments or objections that might be raised. This means that the argument should anticipate and address any potential objections or counterarguments in a thoughtful and convincing manner, rather than simply ignoring or dismissing them. By doing this, the argument shows that it is strong enough to withstand scrutiny and is truly convincing.
In summary, a cogent argument is a well-reasoned, logical, and convincing argument that presents strong and relevant evidence in support of a specific conclusion. It is clear, concise, and able to effectively address any counterarguments or objections that might be raised, making it a powerful and effective tool for persuading others.
What is a cogent argument?
Their thinking goes like this: P1 Patients who have elephantitus display an increased heart rate, elevated blood pressure, a rash on their skin, and a strong desire to visit the elephant pen at the zoo. Cogency Validity and soundness are properties of deductive arguments. I can make an inductive argument like this: P1 90% of 400 students believe that logic is a valuable course. Using force to persuade the mind or reason: compelling persuasive proof. What makes an inductive argument cogent or Uncogent? The opposite of confirmation is weakening, which can be physical, such as a weak link in a chain-link fence; or mental, such as when someone weakens an argument against their position.
Determination of a cogent argument Essay [640 Words] GradeMiners
It is only slightly more likely than not that Jim voted for Obama. The presence of the cigar and the bullet casing at the murder scene is much less surprising if Moriarty committed the murder than if the maid did it. If it is raining, then the ground is wet. Caregivers then treat the patient for the disease that they think the patient probably has. Predicting the Future We constantly use inductive reasoning to predict the future.
5.2: Cogency and Strong Arguments
If you look again at the earlier definitions for deductive validity you will find a good deal of similarity. The first is bias. The use of the ARG is useful in making deductive or inductive reasoning that is essential in the critical and creative thinking Audi 285. Do realists and nominalists actually disagree about what really is, or do they just disagree about words? An cogent inductive argument is one that is both strong and has true premises. These methods of setting off your conclusion help the reader identify the parts of your argument and trace your reasoning.
Validity, Soundness, and Cogency
It is also possible to temper our conclusion with other similar qualifying words. All the three premises are true and augur well with the conclusion statement. For instance, if it turns out that Tweety is an ostrich, then the premises are true but the conclusion is false. The only way to do so would be to observe every single case of something about which we wanted to make an observation. Another problem we might have with the argument is whether I have asked enough students so that the whole population is well-represented. Strong arguments are just arguments whose inference between the premises and conclusion is considered more probable than not. Cogent reasons are those that lead to a single definite conclusion.
Is it true that an argument cannot be both inductive and cogent?
According to the surprise principle, we should count one explanation as better than competing explanations if it would render the facts we are trying to explain less surprising than competing explanations. The fact that all the three premises are taken to be true, substantial grounds is established to believe the conclusion. I could also make the following observation: P2 I like Sex and the City and Twilight. Yes, the premises of a cogent argument are always true because, by definition, a cogent argument is a strong argument. To say an argument is cogent is to say it is good, believable; there is good evidence that the conclusion is true.
Different sources will have different perspectives on the issue. Alternatively, it could also enable you to adapt your stance to accomodate such critics. For example, when asking why someone does something, it is direct if the questioner wants to know whether they were offered money or not; otherwise, it is indirect. ALL THE PREMISES OF A STRONG ARGUMENT CAN BE FALSE! The premises do support the conclusion. Order custom essay Cogent Argument with free plagiarism report Understanding and believing are two different words that confer different meanings altogether, premise three is acceptable and is relevant to the concluding premise. All the three premises are true and augur well with the conclusion statement. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.
2.5: Inductive Strength
The only combination of true and false that validity rules out is all true premises and a false conclusion. P2 Gina is tall, has blonde hair, and has blue eyes. Failing to do so is a logical fallacy known as constructing a " Addressing counterarguments and objections often takes one of the following forms when writing. If the student body numbers in the tens of thousands, I might want to ask a few more before assuming that the opinions of a few mirror those of the many. But we have to be careful when we make an inductive generalization. A SOUND argument is a valid deductive argument with true premises. We are only claiming that if the premises are true then the conclusion is likely to be true.
What Is a Cogent Answer?
Can a cogent argument have all true premises and a false conclusion? An uncogent inductive argument is either a weak argument or a strong argument with a false premise. P2 The patient here in front of me has an increased heart rate, elevated blood pressure, and a strong desire to visit the elephant pen at the zoo. Talk with someone else about your argument. In the above example of a good argument, it is not possible for both of the premises that if it is raining, the ground is wet; and that it is raining to be true and the conclusion the ground is wet to be false. Every valid argument is a sound argument. The first premise specifies a conditional relationship.
Writer's Web: Reasoning: Arguing Cogently
What is the example of cogent argument? All strong arguments are cogent. An uncogent argument is an inductive argument that is either weak or has at least one false premise. The conclusion in this case is dependent upon the individual premises, any opinion regarding the premises directly influences the outcome of the conclusion. Cogency is the quality of being persuasive; the ability to ask and answer questions clearly and convincingly. Hurley Share with friends. Specifically, including all relevant information necessitates considering objections to the reasoning of the writer. Are the premises of a cogent argument always true? Grades do not reflects on the personal values of the students is the fact in the first premise, the second one asserts that there is no legal obligation to believe what is taught in class and the third one informs that the students who are familiar with the evolution story do not believe in it.
With reference to the four premises given in this case there is relevancy in the premises, the three preceding premises are all true allowing them to be relevant to the conclusion. All birds are fish. All the premises are true and combine to give the conclusion that is given in the above case. Back to ' Writer's Web. Is it possible for a strong and cogent inductive argument to have a false conclusion? True premises can lead to either a true or a false conclusion in an invalid argument. Can an argument be both sound and cogent? They can also help clarify our understanding of what happened.