A cogent argument is a well-reasoned and logical argument that presents evidence and reasoning in support of a specific conclusion. It is clear, concise, and convincing, and it effectively addresses any counterarguments or objections that might be raised.
To be considered a cogent argument, the conclusion must be supported by strong and relevant evidence. This evidence should be carefully chosen and presented in a logical way, with each piece of evidence building upon the previous one to create a cohesive and compelling case. The argument should also be structured in a clear and logical way, with each point building upon the previous one to create a cohesive and well-reasoned whole.
In addition to being well-supported and structured, a cogent argument should also be clear and concise. It should be easy for the reader or listener to understand and follow, and it should not contain any unnecessary or irrelevant information. This is important because it helps to ensure that the argument is effective in convincing the reader or listener of the conclusion.
Finally, a cogent argument should also be able to effectively address any counterarguments or objections that might be raised. This means that the argument should anticipate and address any potential objections or counterarguments in a thoughtful and convincing manner, rather than simply ignoring or dismissing them. By doing this, the argument shows that it is strong enough to withstand scrutiny and is truly convincing.
In summary, a cogent argument is a well-reasoned, logical, and convincing argument that presents strong and relevant evidence in support of a specific conclusion. It is clear, concise, and able to effectively address any counterarguments or objections that might be raised, making it a powerful and effective tool for persuading others.
What is a cogent argument?
Their thinking goes like this: P1 Patients who have elephantitus display an increased heart rate, elevated blood pressure, a rash on their skin, and a strong desire to visit the elephant pen at the zoo. Cogency Validity and soundness are properties of deductive arguments. I can make an inductive argument like this: P1 90% of 400 students believe that logic is a valuable course. Using force to persuade the mind or reason: compelling persuasive proof. What makes an inductive argument cogent or Uncogent? The opposite of confirmation is weakening, which can be physical, such as a weak link in a chain-link fence; or mental, such as when someone weakens an argument against their position.
Is it true that an argument cannot be both inductive and cogent?
According to the surprise principle, we should count one explanation as better than competing explanations if it would render the facts we are trying to explain less surprising than competing explanations. The fact that all the three premises are taken to be true, substantial grounds is established to believe the conclusion. I could also make the following observation: P2 I like Sex and the City and Twilight. Yes, the premises of a cogent argument are always true because, by definition, a cogent argument is a strong argument. To say an argument is cogent is to say it is good, believable; there is good evidence that the conclusion is true.
Cogent Argument
Different sources will have different perspectives on the issue. Alternatively, it could also enable you to adapt your stance to accomodate such critics. For example, when asking why someone does something, it is direct if the questioner wants to know whether they were offered money or not; otherwise, it is indirect. ALL THE PREMISES OF A STRONG ARGUMENT CAN BE FALSE! The premises do support the conclusion. Order custom essay Cogent Argument with free plagiarism report Understanding and believing are two different words that confer different meanings altogether, premise three is acceptable and is relevant to the concluding premise. All the three premises are true and augur well with the conclusion statement. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.
