Public schools, also known as government or state schools, are funded and run by the government and serve all students within a specific geographic area, regardless of their family's income or background. Private schools, on the other hand, are funded by tuition fees and are typically run by a private organization, such as a religious group or a for-profit company.
There are a number of reasons why public schools may outperform private schools. One reason is that public schools often have a more diverse student population, which can lead to a more enriching educational experience for all students. In a diverse learning environment, students are exposed to a variety of perspectives and experiences, which can broaden their understanding of the world and help them develop important critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Another reason why public schools may outperform private schools is that they often have more resources at their disposal. Public schools receive funding from the government, which allows them to hire qualified teachers, purchase necessary resources and materials, and provide extracurricular activities and support services to students. In contrast, private schools may not have the same level of funding, which can limit their ability to provide a high-quality education to their students.
Additionally, public schools are required to meet certain standards and accountability measures, which can help ensure that students receive a consistent and high-quality education. These standards and accountability measures may not be as strict or thorough in private schools.
Overall, while private schools may have their own advantages, the benefits of a diverse student population and access to resources and accountability measures make public schools a strong choice for many families.
Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools
Even more surprising, they show that the very mechanism that market-based reformers champion—autonomy—may be the crucial factor that prevents private schools from performing better. Private schools have higher scores not because they are better institutions but because their students largely come from more privileged backgrounds that offer greater educational support. Voucher programs provide opportunities for low income students in a number of cities to enroll in private schools. Chris and Sarah Lubienski provide both the data and the clear explanations needed to understand the many false claims made about the superiority of schools that are not public. Even more surprising, they show that the very mechanism that market-based reformers champion—autonomy—may be the crucial factor that prevents private schools from performing better. In an argument that would drive Klein and company to distraction, the authors suggest that because public school teachers are subject to more stringent certification regulations as well as more frequent professional development and oversight, they end up being more plugged into recent advances in curriculum and instruction, such as the new pedagogical approaches developed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
The Public School Advantage: Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools by Christopher A. Lubienski
Consider the competitive marketplace of for-profit higher education. This approach is evident in efforts such as charter schools, vouchers and tax credits for private schools, private management of schools, and privatization. An abbreviated list of districts facing serious allegations of cheating includes Detroit, Washington, D. Where random assignment is not possible—and it most often is not—researchers have used "propensity scores,""interrupted time series," and other methods more sophisticated than the linear regressions used in this book to obtain estimates considered state-of-the-art among researchers. After correcting for demographics, the Lubienskis go on to show that gains in student achievement at public schools are at least as great and often greater than those at private ones. Teachers and administrators allegedly changed tens of thousands of test answers. The nation's education future does not lie in a choice between government- or market-dominated schools.
The Public School Advantage: Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools
Even more distressingly, the Lubienskis ignore the The net effect of these three methodological choices, plus the fact that standardized math results are more closely aligned with how the subject is taught in public than private schools, strongly skew the results in favor of public schools. After correcting for demographics, the Lubienskis go on to show that gains in student achievement at public schools are at least as great and often greater than those at private ones. In spite of these limitations, "Public School Advantage" is a book to be reckoned with. In spite of these limitations, Public School Advantageis a book to be reckoned with. Despite our politics, we all agree on the fundamental fact: education deserves our utmost care.
Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools
And for years this question has played out ferociously in the debates about how we should educate our children. It remains an open question, however, whether charters offer a superior education to specific student populations. With The Public School Advantage, Christopher A. The only two school-level variables the Lubienskis found were consistently positive predictors of student achievement were teacher certification and reliance on instructional practices informed by professional guidelines, both of which directly pertain to the issue of autonomy and both of which are more prevalent in traditional public schools. Too few serious investigations have been undertaken to really get at the full scope of the cheating problem, but it clearly goes beyond the and other defenders of test-based accountability. Other measures of student need in the two sectors show student differences that are much smaller.
The public school advantage : why public schools outperform private schools : Lubienski, Christopher, author : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
And for years this question has played out ferociously in the debates about how we should educate our children. Despite what many reformers, policy makers, media elites, and even parents may believe, these public schools are, on average, actually providing a more effective educational service relative to schools in the independent sector. Yet as the data indicate, those behaviors are not an accurate reflection of the reality of school effectiveness. On incentives, the authors overlook the potential of carrots, such as merit pay, and sticks, such as school closures, to encourage bad behavior, but the impact can be significant. The Public School Advantage offers exactly that.
The Public School Advantage: Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools, Lubienski, Lubienski
We are living in an era in which the solution is always markets, but competition among schools does not always lead to improved education. The Private School Effect 4. Where the private sector is nimble, the public sector is slow. These patterns flew in the face of both the common wisdom and the research consensus on the effectiveness of public and private schools. And that, in turn, creates no incentive for better performance, greater efficiency, or more innovation — all things as necessary in public education as they are in any other field. Such was the perplexity expressed by one prominent economist when faced with unexpected patterns such as these: This result is quite surprising, because it appears to violate simple price theory.
