The man who would be king analysis. The Man Who Would Be King Analysis opportunities.alumdev.columbia.edu 2022-10-30

The man who would be king analysis Rating: 8,7/10 1422 reviews

"The Man Who Would Be King" is a novella written by Rudyard Kipling in 1888, which tells the story of two British adventurers, Daniel Dravot and Peachey Carnehan, who set out to become kings in the remote and isolated region of Kafiristan, located in what is now Afghanistan.

At the beginning of the story, Dravot and Carnehan are presented as rough and unrefined characters, but they are also clever and resourceful. They have spent their lives traveling and seeking adventure, and they are determined to find a place where they can rule and be wealthy. They believe that Kafiristan, a place where the people are isolated and have no government, is the perfect opportunity for them to realize their dream.

As Dravot and Carnehan make their way to Kafiristan, they encounter various challenges and obstacles. They must navigate treacherous mountain passes and deal with hostile native tribes. However, they are able to use their wit and strength to overcome these challenges and gain the respect of the people of Kafiristan.

Once they arrive in Kafiristan, Dravot and Carnehan quickly establish themselves as leaders and begin to implement their own form of government. They bring law and order to the region and become beloved by the people. However, their success is short-lived, as they are eventually betrayed and their kingdom crumbles.

One of the most interesting themes in "The Man Who Would Be King" is the idea of identity and the role it plays in our lives. Dravot and Carnehan are able to transform themselves from simple adventurers into rulers and leaders, but they are ultimately unable to sustain this new identity. They are unable to escape their own limitations and flaws, and they are ultimately brought down by their own ambition and hubris.

Another theme in the novella is the concept of imperialism and the dangers of trying to impose one's own culture and values on others. As Dravot and Carnehan try to impose their own form of government on the people of Kafiristan, they are met with resistance and eventually fail. This serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of imperialism and the importance of respecting other cultures and ways of life.

In conclusion, "The Man Who Would Be King" is a thought-provoking and engaging story that explores themes of identity, imperialism, and the dangers of ambition. It serves as a reminder that our attempts to shape our own identities and impose our own values on others can often lead to our own downfall.

The Man Who Would Be King Summary

the man who would be king analysis

The three men march toward the troops. Out of curiosity, the narrator went to the Serai and found Dravot disguised as a mad priest and Carnehan as his servant. Billy Fish realizes it is hopeless because the priests have sent runners to every village to announce that Dravot, who bleeds, is not a god but a mortal man. At this revelation, the people began to worship him. Although Peachey is far more concerned about the hubristic pretense that he and Dravot are Master Masons, Dravot is enthralled by the power this false rank affords him as a king and then a god.

Next

The Man Who Would Be King Analysis opportunities.alumdev.columbia.edu

the man who would be king analysis

He says he held Dravot's hand throughout the journey. In the 19th century, when the story takes place, asylums were a new innovation in medicine, where people believed those with mental illnesses could be cured. . One such way was through his story about two British Imperialists named Peachey Carnehan and Daniel Dravot. Not only was Kipling such an adventurous person, but he was also a journalist for Britain during their imperialist era.

Next

The Man Who Would Be King Plot Summary

the man who would be king analysis

Dravot puts a hand on Peachey's shoulder and, while thanking him for his loyalty, says, "You can't help me. He asked for a wife, which made the chiefs and priests suspicious of his god status. He also conned them into thinking he knew Imbra, the idol god they worshiped. Girl Trouble Dravot tells Peachey that he wants a wife. A slice of a blade send Dravot falling to his miserable death.

Next

The Man Who Would Be King Summary & Study Guide

the man who would be king analysis

A huge man, who the narrator describes as a "wanderer and a vagabond," enters the car and regales the narrator with tales of his adventures in the remotest corners of India. A frame narrative will have several different frames, or characters whose voices tell part of the story. . For the next six months, Dravot learned their language and consulted priests and chiefs, eventually sending Carnehan to trade for better artillery. Billy Fish tells Peachey that if he can "induce the King to drop all this nonsense about marriage," he would be doing them all "a great service. He says the will go and meet them alone. After ten days, the narrator receives news that two have made it at least as far as Kabul.

Next

The Man Who Would Be King Symbols, Allegory and Motifs

the man who would be king analysis

He brought with him the head, crown, and hand of Daniel Dravot. Dravot tells Peachey the people believe Dravot is a god and the son of Alexander the Great. They introduced themselves as Brother Peachey Carnehan and Brother Daniel Dravot. But still, doubts remain. Afterward, he realizes the wise thing to do is report both the man on the train and his redheaded associate to the authorities. Because Dan and Peachey happen to be Master Freemasons, they are well acquainted with the symbol and also with the rites of the Third Degree.


Next

Masons Analysis in The Man Who Would Be King

the man who would be king analysis

Peachy is surprised when the two chiefs return the Masonic handshake of "the Craft" he offers. Rising Action 2 Peachey and Dravot tell the narrator their ambitions. The Masonic Third Degree Symbol The symbol of the Masonic Third Degree is not described in detail, however it represents hidden knowledge that is of divine origin. Thus, when the Kafiris mistakenly identify Dravot with Alexander, they worship him as divine, as a god. . Their army revolted with the weapons Dravot and Carnehan provided and trained them to use.

Next

the man who would be king analysis

. When the ropes are severed, Dravot falls "round and round twenty thousand miles. He describes what he sees near his chair as "what was left of a man. Suspicions raised by one priest merely turned out to confirm his story in the eyes of the people while Peachey became content to take on the role of commander-in-chief. By telling part of the story from the perspective of the narrator, Rudyard Kipling makes what might otherwise be considered Peachey's unbelievably fantastic tale into a viscerally affecting and more believable story because the narrator conveys his shock and horror at Peachey's recounting of it and brings it closer to the reader.

Next

the man who would be king analysis

The crazed tale includes killing the camels for food, murdering a man for his cart, killing the mules dragging the car for food and taking up sides with the winning party in a civil war among the Kafirs. Analysis Frame Narrative A frame narrative is a story told within a story. He asks the narrator for some whiskey and a little money. As the neighbor exits the train, the narrator ponders over the many times before that he has heard of this same on and they always end the same way which is usually not very good for scammers like the stranger. I am Peachey," the narrator is dumbfounded.

Next