Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political or ideological goals. It is a tactic that has been employed by various groups throughout history, and it continues to be a major concern in the modern world. Despite the motivations that may drive individuals or organizations to engage in terrorism, it is a tactic that can never be justified.
One of the fundamental problems with terrorism is that it violates the basic principles of human rights and international law. The use of violence to achieve political or ideological objectives is a blatant violation of the right to life and security of persons. It also violates the principles of non-violent conflict resolution, as it seeks to achieve goals through the use of force rather than through dialogue and negotiation.
In addition to violating basic human rights, terrorism is also ineffective as a means of achieving political or ideological goals. It is often counterproductive, as it tends to generate fear and mistrust among the general population, and it often leads to a backlash against the group or ideology that is being promoted. This can further polarize and divide societies, making it more difficult to achieve the goals that the terrorists are trying to promote.
Furthermore, terrorism often causes significant harm to innocent people. The use of indiscriminate violence can result in the deaths and injuries of innocent bystanders, as well as the destruction of property and infrastructure. This can have long-lasting effects on individuals, families, and communities, and it can contribute to further violence and conflict.
In conclusion, terrorism cannot be justified under any circumstances. It is a tactic that violates basic human rights, is ineffective as a means of achieving goals, and causes significant harm to innocent people. It is essential that we work together to combat terrorism and promote non-violent conflict resolution in order to create a more peaceful and just world.
Terrorism cannot be justified essay
+on+the+principle+of+protecting+future+generations&year=2021&TypeOfDocument=UnescoPhysicalDocument&mat=PGD&ct=true&size=512&isPhysical=1)
There has not been any particular set of rules guarding issue of torture warrants to immediate ticking bomb scenarios. September 11th was the first time since Pearl Harbor in 1941 that the United States was attacked on its own soil. Terrorists motivates a person by telling them about how the country or the nation is either being attacked or invaded by intruders. Indeed, the architects of the state may subscribe to humanitarian codes. You race to the phone, dial frantically with your fingers crossed, hoping, praying that they are alright.
Can Torture Of Terrorist Suspects Be Justified?
Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? Effective type of communication in an organisation assignment Formal communication is that which is connected with the formal organizational arrangement and the official status or the place of the communicator and the receiver. Officials could apply to a judge for a torture warrant based on the absolute need to immediately obtain information which will save lives. Ganor, B 1998 'Is One Man 's Terrorist Another Man 's Freedom Fighter? However deeply we study the causes of the growth of terrorism even understands the motivation behind it we cannot justify it. History is replete with the ideas of great thinkers who believed that, under the right circumstances, unconventional tactics were not only smart, but a moral or civic duty. The expressive activity is possible only at a very heavy price-the loss of human lives.
Terrorism Isn’t and Can Never Be Justified Essay Example
The media has made it easier to attack and get the fame that terrorist want Simonsen and Spindlove Pg. Created on land seized from Palestine, Israel to this day enjoys massive moral and financial support from America. In a study by Mark Burgess 2003 for the U. While this may or may not be the case, two important questions follow which are asked all too rarely. On the other hand, Pacifism looks at terrorism as an immoral and like in the case of political realism; it approves the use of any form of violence in fighting terrorists. How do individuals and organizations justify these acts of terror? Because of the wars that are happening in the Middle East, many people are seeking refugee or asylum in European countries. This theory also specifies how a given war should be fought Evans, 2005.
Is Terrorism Ever Justified Essay Example
In this section however we will find it is not only the methodology of …show more content… I agree with this entirely as quite often a terrorist organisation becomes deluded by their aims and forgets to look at the wellbeing of a whole society. The earliest account of a terrorist act in the second part of the 19th century was in 1968 when a Palestinian terrorist hijacked an Israeli airliner What Is Terrorism? In what follows I shall endeavour to explore a number of issues that confront academics when discussing the judgement of terrorism. Given the just war tradition and the tactical definition of terrorism, terrorism is morrally wrong. It is however difficult to establish and define the motivations of terrorists. Whether that in itself is right or wrong is undecided, but nowadays terrorist attacks kill people simply because they are there. Government, terrorism has different definitions, not accounting also scholars' own definitions of this concept. The New Plague Terrorism kills innocents as well as those who may be directly involved with combat.
why terrorism cannot be justified under any circumstances
People have their loved snatched away from them. Print Hanson, Granton, and Spilimbergo, Alienat. If the maxim of a given action is serving the duty of the moral law, then that particular action is justified Shafer-Landau, 2012. Or rephrase that and ask yourself this question instead: can slaughtering innocent people ever be justified? Distinction states that there is a difference between the combatants and non-combatants, and there are actions that cannot be used on non-combatants. New York: Basic Books. Strictly speaking rights should not be judged in comparative terms. Violence cannot be condemned outright even if it is a type of force.
