Sydney opera house project management case study. Sydney Opera House: Project Management Failures Case Study 2022-11-03
Sydney opera house project management case study Rating:
6,3/10
1006
reviews
The Sydney Opera House is a world-renowned performing arts center located in Sydney, Australia. It is a modern architectural masterpiece and a cultural icon for the city of Sydney. However, the project to construct the Opera House was plagued with numerous challenges and controversies, making it a case study in project management.
The project was initiated in the 1950s with the goal of building a world-class performing arts center in Sydney. The government of New South Wales held a design competition and chose the design submitted by Danish architect Jørn Utzon. Utzon's design, which featured a series of shell-like structures, was considered revolutionary at the time and captured the imagination of the public.
Construction of the Opera House began in 1959 and was originally expected to be completed in 1963 at a cost of $7 million. However, the project soon ran into numerous challenges and delays. The design of the Opera House was complex and required innovative engineering solutions, which proved to be difficult to implement. Additionally, the project faced budget overruns and a shortage of skilled labor, which further contributed to the delays.
As the project dragged on, tensions between Utzon and the project management team began to rise. Utzon, who was known for his perfectionist approach to design, clashed with the project team over the execution of his design. In 1966, Utzon resigned from the project, leaving the management team to complete the construction without his guidance.
The Opera House was finally completed in 1973, 10 years behind schedule and at a cost of $102 million, which was 14 times the original budget. The project was marred by numerous controversies, including allegations of mismanagement, corruption, and political interference.
Despite these challenges, the Sydney Opera House is now recognized as one of the greatest architectural achievements of the 20th century. It has become a symbol of Sydney and is visited by millions of tourists each year. The Opera House serves as a reminder of the importance of strong project management and the need to overcome challenges and setbacks in order to achieve success.
Sydney Opera House Project Management Analysis
The authors of the article, Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, strive for a balance of theories by giving each stakeholder a class as determined by three characteristics: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Individually, each paper introduces a new framework part or solidifies a previous one. As per the result drew in this research, the most important factor that is directly linked for project success is project organization. The project was also very much before its time regarding technological innovation. Utnoz arrived at this idea after their initial one of using bronze laminated mullions happens to be complicated. Several articles were used to aid in the criticfal analysis of this project.
Project Management: Project Failures Sydney Opera House Case Study Essay Example
Utzon failed to recognize this. Through algorithmic decision constructs, IT dependent organisations collect information defining the planned project execution processes, variation in the processes, and information on why such variations take place, and mechanisms of improving projects in the context of the desired long-term and short-term outcomes. We chose this focus because stakeholder analysis allowed us to focus our report while also encompassing the broadest range of issues. In this light, this paper recommends that even if the Sydney Opera House Project were to be initiated again, the extra time and financial resources consumed in redesigns and mitigation of other challenges encountered during the process of the execution of the project remain valid to the extent that the project delivered quality and glamour perceived by its idea creators. House History Proudly Sponsored by Baulderstone Hornibrook.
The Sidney Opera House construction: A case of project management failure
. This initial estimate was however drawn on incomplete design drawings and site surveys which later lead to disagreements. The building gives the viewer an experience of pleasure, amazement, and marvel when seen first time. Though the initial design was decided upon by Utzon solely, the whole team collaborated on the implementation of it from the very beginning and had the opportunity to share their ideas and knowledge before starting off the project. The project manager can easily track the project schedule and indicate the project performance. This means that project managers will have to have a more comprehensive assessment of the risks and costs, not only on the financial level, but the impact of the relationship between top management, organization structure and the client. This strayed from the traditional model from the 50s where the architect took on nearly the entire management role.
This is because they see the project as a financial income, but if it is a success, it would also benefit their reputation. . Transfer of further construct to Australian engineers required change in plan. The estimators consultants, accountants, auditors didn't make those errors; other members of the project team did Utzon, Arup. As mentioned earlier, Utzon had a lot of power and urgency within this project, so as a stakeholder he was able to govern most of the decisions of construction. The more the personal interest in opera and other classical arts increases effect other factors subsided for a visitor.
Sydney Opera House case study opportunities.alumdev.columbia.edu
Download file to see previous pages Eventually, John Utzon, architecture from Denmark won the tender after displaying the best ideas in his design, which was motivated by his experience on structures like the Mayan temple. . However, project delivery in the construction industry comes with a higher degree of uncertainty due to Industrial factors, complexity and changing technologies and uniqueness of projects where time, cost and quality need to be managed, sometimes equally, sometimes differently. The Saga Of Sydney Opera House: The Dramatic Story Of The Design And Construction Of The Icon Of Modern Australia. .
Case Study: Sydney Opera House Assignment Sample by Top Academic Writers
Project sucess and triple constraint Triple constraints refer to the list of primary requirements in the project management process which includes project scope, time and costs management. Identify Stakeholder When writing project requirements, Stakeholders should be on the priority to focus. Furthermore, the government of Sydney tends to over-control the economic experiences sector, a factor that may discourage the management in terms of new strategies implementation Hobbs and Bjørn 2001. This was not so, and due to the lack of designs to work with, new ones had to be created based on the current structure of the Opera House and many unforeseen complications were found. However, it limits innovation, requires extensive management efforts and puts most of the completion risk on the owner.
The roofs are made up of 2,914 pre-cast concrete sections; these sections are covered with exactly 1,056,056 Swedish ceramic tiles. He used his new power to stop meeting Utzons funding requests. However, there are still complaints from some parties on the acoustical properties as well as on the inadequacy of support spaces UNESCO, 2009. PM effort is coordinated to reach a particular goal or perform some speci? However, the questioning of the roles projects to time, quality, budget to define a project is increasing. For these reasons, and more, Utzon was seen to be a dangerous stakeholder, and his power in the project led to erratic decisions and many re-designs.
Sydney Opera House Construction Project Case Study Example
Furthermore, as argued by the head architect, Utzon, the prototype proposed was not designed for the required structure. However, the disadvantage is that it tends to leave potential gains in design and construction unexploited. It requires a long period for the design phase and usually involves a great number of participants which is costly and time-consuming, although its expected to give outstanding results. Therefore, a collaborative strategy will be successful in this highly competitive market. The government and Arup also fall under these restrictions because their lack of urgency allows them to be predictable.
The highest point of the building is 67m above sea level. Its completion was anticipated in1963. Time management could also be identified as a big issue for the project and its completion. Apart from considering a project to have failed for it was not completed within the stipulated time and financial budgets, it is crucial to also consider the implication of the failure to complete the project in time and within financial budget to the stakeholders. .
