Situational leadership theory essay. Situational Leadership Style 2022-10-10
Situational leadership theory essay Rating:
7,7/10
1789
reviews
Situational leadership theory is a leadership style that involves adapting one's leadership style to the individual needs, skills, and abilities of team members. This theory, developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, suggests that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to leadership and that the most effective leaders are able to adapt their leadership style based on the situation at hand.
There are four main leadership styles that are used in situational leadership theory: telling, selling, participating, and delegating. The telling style involves giving specific instructions and closely supervising team members. This style is most effective when team members are new or unskilled and need guidance. The selling style involves providing guidance and support while still allowing team members to take the lead. This style is most effective when team members are capable but need motivation and support. The participating style involves working alongside team members and taking a collaborative approach to problem-solving. This style is most effective when team members are highly skilled and motivated. The delegating style involves giving team members the autonomy to make their own decisions and take ownership of their work. This style is most effective when team members are highly skilled and able to handle responsibility.
Situational leadership theory also takes into account the readiness level of team members. Readiness is a combination of a team member's skill and willingness to take on a task. A team member's readiness level will change over time as they gain new skills and become more confident in their abilities. A leader using situational leadership theory should adapt their leadership style to match the readiness level of their team members.
There are several benefits to using situational leadership theory. One benefit is that it allows leaders to be flexible and adapt their leadership style to meet the needs of their team. This can help to build trust and improve team performance. Additionally, situational leadership theory can help to develop the skills and confidence of team members, which can lead to long-term success.
While situational leadership theory is a useful tool for leaders, it is important to remember that it is just one approach to leadership. No single leadership style is the best in all situations, and it is important for leaders to be aware of their own strengths and limitations. It is also important for leaders to be open to feedback and to continuously reassess their leadership style to ensure that it is meeting the needs of their team.
Situational Leadership Theory
According to Pearce and Conger 2003, p. Second, the leaders shall energise and motivate the followers. The theory is one of the most influential theories around in recent times and is used as a guiding philosophy for human resource management in many companies. However , this Situational leadership theory SLT model concentrates on only one situational aspect that is,the maturity level of the subordinates, to judge the leadership effectiveness. In the effort to avail information on various ways of accomplishing these tasks of leadership, this paper analyses, compares and then contrasts the trait leadership theory, situational leadership hypothesis, and contingency theory. Conclusion This theory talks about following different approaches according to or appropriate to the situations, the developers also helped to form or build different strategies to follow in different cases.
Therefore, the three theories have a great influence to the employees. Get Help With Your Essay If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help! Effective leaders motivate themselves and others to be the best in their field of study. It is very difficult to work efficiently in a team without knowing what your style of work. With this leadership style, leaders are usually concentrate on activities like organizing, initiating, clarifying and information gathering. The model suggests that successful leadership is accomplished by selecting the right leadership style, based on the level of followers readiness.
Clawson 2011 discusses leadership being a quality whereby an individual deals with vitality, firstly inside themselves and after in people around them. They believe there is no single universal effective leadership method that exists, as any form of leadership style or method can be effective under certain condition. Before someone can lead others and make a difference in an organization, they must lead themselves. These follower-oriented theories focus on the dyadic relationship between leaders and their followers. However, the theory is not based on any level of research, rather there is virtually no evidence to substantiate its fundamental tenets, which is surprising considering the wide popularity of the theory among personnel managers and training directors. Every time the relation between the supporters and the tasks vary, this type of leadership style enables the leaders to readjust their behaviours and acts to satisfy the new state of affairs. And a leader should choose an appropriate leadership style depending on the maturity level of the team.
Trait and Situational Leadership and Contingency Theory
I am good in sharing the problems of anyone but I am afraid of taking the risks. For example, the method in which a directive leader structures a task can motivate or demotivate employees. Manager B consistently scored highly in human relations and friendliness in his performance reviews. It is a task-oriented leadership theory and emphasizes on the role of the leader to accomplish a finite goal. The leader defines roles and tells people what, how, when, and where to do various tasks. Applicability of trait leadership theories in my organization Although trait theories identify qualities that define people capability to lead with precision, their application in my organization or any other organization is problematic.
For these reasons, the trait approach fell out of favor in organizational psychology. . However, they do not have the confidence to take on sole responsibility for task accomplishment. By using the situational leadership theory model, leaders can adapt their leadership according to the needs of the employees, and conduct an effective leadership based on the situational context. However, the leader follows a laissez-faire type of leadership with his subordinates at the time of work.
Situational Leadership Theory Essay. Through This Paper
In this regard, it should be noted that not all individuals possess the visualization, spirit, insight, power, persistence, or luck to lead in every circumstance regardless of their characters, abilities, or style. Reframing is an ability to understand and use multiple perspectives. He exudes various leadership traits to motivate his men to go into battle. The leader provides both directive behavior and supportive behavior; participating high relationship-low task. The second is the task leadership, which concerns the task the group is facing rather than member satisfaction. Situational leadership is easy to understand, intuitively sensible, and easily applied in a variety of settings Northouse 2007. In brief, the TL communicates vision, sets performance stands, and motivates and challenges employees towards achieving that goal.
From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs. There are several tasks that employee can handle themselves; some managers assume the potential of the employees, wish to undertake every job in the organization, it is considered too much effort that does not help, but harms the organization through employee demoralization. They are not only able and willing to perform their tasks, but are also willing to take on independent responsibility for the accomplishment of tasks. Therefore, it was hard for employees to associate any positive outcomes with our efforts. In Laissez-faire leadership, followers are expected to make decisions without any direction or supervision from the leader. I learned a lot about myself, my elusive strengths and my weaknesses. We acknowledge the concept of teamwork and its importance to the success of our team.
Can people be taught to have leadership or managerial qualities? Situational Leadership — Situational leadership theorists observed that a variety of leadership styles could be used simultaneously in response to changing situations. Thus refers to the degree to which: the task requirements are clearly and minutely defined, problems likely to be encountered can be solved by a variety of producers, the correctness of a decision can be easily verified, and there are alternative correct solutions to task problems. First is the telling style, which entails proving task orientation with a clear explanation necessary at the start of a group life cycle. The underlying assumption is that followers will be motivated to perform if they believe they can complete the job. This implies that situational leadership style can indicate to the manager what to do under different circumstances and characters. Assumption underpinning contingency leadership theories The chief assumption of contingency theory is that leadership styles are inflexible.
This is because leaders may not be able to identify situations where the various leadership styles apply more appropriately or that they lack the capacity or expertise to employ the appropriate behaviors whenever the telling or the directing styles are most appropriate. The second level M2 of maturity involves followers who generally have the will to do a task but they lack the capacity to do so independently. The main weakness that I saw was the treatment of the leader. However, because manager B had inferior academic qualifications, we thought he lacked what was needed to climb the corporate ladder. The situational leadership can be challenging if not expertly employed. In addition to his agreeableness, supervisor A was very involved in the day-to-day activities of his staff. Central to the development of the trait leadership theory is the need to provide a classification of leadership traits.
