Should welfare recipients be drug tested pros. Pros and Cons of Drug Testing Welfare Recipients 2022-10-30
Should welfare recipients be drug tested pros Rating:
The debate over whether welfare recipients should be drug tested has been a contentious issue for many years. There are arguments on both sides of the issue, and ultimately, the decision of whether to implement drug testing for welfare recipients will depend on the values and priorities of a given society.
On the pro side, there are several arguments in favor of drug testing welfare recipients. One argument is that drug testing can ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used responsibly. When people receive welfare benefits, they are essentially receiving financial assistance from the government, which is funded by taxpayers. If some welfare recipients are using drugs, then they may not be using the benefits they receive in a responsible manner. Drug testing could help ensure that welfare benefits are being used for their intended purpose, which is to provide assistance to those in need.
Another argument in favor of drug testing welfare recipients is that it could help to reduce drug abuse among this population. If welfare recipients know that they will be drug tested, they may be less likely to use drugs, as they could lose their benefits if they fail the test. This could help to reduce the negative consequences associated with drug abuse, such as increased risk of overdose and addiction, as well as the associated costs to society.
A third argument in favor of drug testing welfare recipients is that it could serve as a deterrent to drug use. If people know that they will be drug tested in order to receive welfare benefits, they may be less likely to use drugs in the first place, as they may not want to risk losing their benefits. This could help to reduce the overall prevalence of drug use in society, which could have a number of positive impacts, such as improved public health and safety.
There are also several arguments against drug testing welfare recipients. One argument is that drug testing may be seen as stigmatizing or discriminatory. Some people may view drug testing as a way of judging or punishing welfare recipients, rather than as a means of ensuring that benefits are being used responsibly. This could create feelings of resentment or mistrust among welfare recipients, which could be harmful to their mental health and well-being.
Another argument against drug testing welfare recipients is that it may not be effective at achieving its intended goals. While drug testing may deter some people from using drugs, it may not have a significant impact on overall drug use rates among this population. In addition, drug testing may not be an effective way of identifying people who are struggling with addiction, as it only tests for the presence of drugs at a given moment, rather than assessing long-term drug use patterns.
In conclusion, the decision of whether to drug test welfare recipients is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the decision will depend on the values and priorities of a given society, and the potential costs and benefits of drug testing will need to be carefully weighed before any policy decisions are made.
Morally Qualified: Should Welfare Recipients be Required to Pass Drug Tests?
The fairness is key, why should I have to work a full time job and pay a lot of money for health insurance and childcare all while some receiving public assistance get free health care and childcare covered by the state. Therefore, leaving loop holes in the defense that drug testing welfare recipients would be infringing upon their fourth amendment. Sponsors of these bills insist that while cost savings are nice, these measures are really about changing behaviors Greenblatt, 2012. Welfare pays for many different things like unemployment, housing assistance, foods stamps and more. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor, go to the emergency department, or call 911 immediately.
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing
As of May 2016, at least 17 states were in the process of creating drug testing legislation for welfare recipients, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures NCSL. For as long as America has been around, the core of society has been centered around entrepreneurship. One of the primary benefits that come with the information obtained through drug testing is that it offers social workers data about what barriers may be in place for an individual. Considering the economic costs and benefits is a crucial step in thoughtful consideration, although it is all too often overlooked or under researched. ABOUT USVision Launch Media is a global discovery platform for free-speech and independent thought. If people who are applying for a job to get money have to take a drug test, then welfare recipients should have to too. Just one state had a usage rate above 1% in this study.
The Pros and Cons of Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients
People on drugs get way too many free passes and handouts yet not getting any real help offered to them, like rehab, counseling. Welfare recipients should be drug tested. The main premise behind drug testing of welfare applicants is that the state will save money by kicking drug addicts off of welfare and thereby deny benefits. Most states that conduct welfare drug testing combine paper questionnaires followed by physical drug testing if an applicant's answers on the questionnaire indicate a strong probability that the applicant is a substance abuser. Essay On Welfare Drug Testing 460 Words 2 Pages The Downside of Drug Testing Welfare Recipients To continue receiving benefits, should welfare recipients be drug tested? We could also contend that people will be motivated to lie on their questionnaires because they need their welfare benefits, thus preventing them from getting the drug treatment they need and simply perpetuating the addiction problem. In 1961, Congress created a program that was designed to help both farmers and poor people. CONCLUSION: The idea is simple; no taxpayer wants to see their hard earned money to pay for someone on welfare to pay for drugs.
In Florida, during four months of drug testing , only 2. This can be directly correlated to the issue of whether or not a recipient is compliant when asked to be administered a drug test. Every year, many local, state, and national government programs offer low-income households the opportunity to make ends meet. Taxpayers should provide support to those in need, recipients in return should engage in responsible behavior for receiving assistance. One of the most positive aspects of the welfare drug testing programs that exist in the United States today is the fact that they encourage people to stop using illicit drugs.
However, in many not all jobs, in order to apply for certain positions, a drug test is administered, although that is hardly ever looked at as unconstitutional when corporate leaders are held accountable for their actions when accepting public funds. Should Wefare Recipients Be Drug tested References: Wessler, S. The goal of the war on poverty was to completely abolish poverty by funding programs that aided the poor during the 60s. Drug testing welfare recipients would decrease the amount of people abusing the system, it would require recipients to stay free of using drugs, and would reveal recipients who are wasting the tax payers money. A Senator stated a proposal for drug testing fears it would allow the government to pick on poor people.
Randomly drug testing would benefit the system, others on assistance, and tax payers. Welfare Drug Testing 1017 Words 5 Pages Working individuals are required to perform these drug tests in order to maintain employee standards for their given company Besonen. Although drug abuse occurs in every social demographic, it is more likely for someone in the poverty class to be abusing drugs than someone in the wealthier classes. The goal of drug testing welfare recipients is not to revoke their privileges, it is simply to reform the system of welfare and make sure that those who truly need assistance are having their needs met. Welfare was meant to be a good system to help others during a hard time, but it was not meant to fund the unplowed until death, and it was not meant to put the working class in debt either. Some agree that people who consider being welfare recipients should get tested, for simple fact certain people get on welfare with a drug habit and removing them is one way to save taxpayer and the government billions of dollars. While many are more than willing to take the drug tests, there are also quite a few who are very reluctant toward this new qualification.
Welfare is a big discussion being brought to the table in many states, a lot of testing is being done to find out the real pros and cons deterring welfare recipients. You …show more content… It is illegal for the government to conduct searches pertaining to the population that is on What Causes Hunger In America One in six people in America face hunger and one in seven are enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP "11 Facts About Hunger in the US. City of Tigard, basically stating that when the benefit does have a relationship to the right, the government may, perhaps, withhold the benefit. Since 2010, Arizona has screened all TANF applicants via a paper questionnaire and then refers individuals for drug testing if there is a reasonable suspicion that the applicant may be a substance abuser. There are plenty of opinions that agree and disagree with the drug tests, but real statistics uncover the hard truth about the success of welfare drug testing. In some cases, welfare might even save lives. They often cite that politicians who support this have no compassion for the poor and are just trying to further contribute to their struggle.
Should there be Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients?
If so many employers drug test, then why shouldn 't welfare drug test? No one likes the idea of having their money wasted. Nevertheless, in the case of the negative result of the drug test, the charges of the applicant are reimbursed. Entrepreneurship The most notable quality in the character of America is the Countries ability to breed innovative minds that benefit the economy. Food-share fraud is another reason for proposers of drug mandating laws in Wisconsin. The most effective way is if you use hair to see if someone is using drugs you can usually tell for about 9 days it also depends on what drug they are using.
Arizona only requires individuals convicted of a previous drug-related offense to provide this data in their proposals. Drug testing could influence the lower class to stay off drugs. The idea of administering mandatory drug tests to welfare recipients is one that has often been thrown around or suggested, but less often analyzed more thoroughly. Welfare programs are now trying to put into place a new qualification where any possible recipients of welfare are required to take a drug test. Some citizens believe that recipients of welfare should undergo mandatory drug testing. Retrieved February 23, 2014, from us news.