Should the death penalty be abolished article. 10 Reasons to Abolish the Death Penalty 2022-11-05
Should the death penalty be abolished article Rating:
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a controversial and divisive issue that has been debated for centuries. Some people believe that the death penalty is a necessary form of retribution for the most heinous crimes, while others argue that it is an outdated and barbaric practice that should be abolished. In this essay, I will argue that the death penalty should be abolished for several reasons.
Firstly, the death penalty is ineffective as a deterrent. Studies have shown that the death penalty does not significantly reduce crime rates compared to other forms of punishment. In fact, some countries that have abolished the death penalty, such as Canada and the United Kingdom, have seen decreases in crime rates. This suggests that the death penalty is not necessary for preventing crime and that other, more effective measures can be taken to reduce crime.
Secondly, the death penalty is prone to error and injustice. There have been numerous cases in which innocent people have been sentenced to death and later exonerated, sometimes decades later. This is due to a variety of factors, including flawed eyewitness testimony, faulty forensic evidence, and misconduct by law enforcement officials. The risk of executing an innocent person is simply too high to justify the death penalty.
Thirdly, the death penalty is disproportionately applied to marginalized and disadvantaged groups. People of color, particularly African Americans, are significantly more likely to be sentenced to death than white people, even when controlling for the severity of the crime. Similarly, people who are poor or mentally ill are more likely to receive the death penalty due to their lack of access to quality legal representation. This is a clear example of how the death penalty is used to discriminate against and oppress certain groups in society.
Finally, the death penalty is a costly and inefficient form of punishment. The process of appealing a death sentence is lengthy and expensive, and the costs associated with carrying out a death sentence are much higher than those of life imprisonment. This money could be better spent on crime prevention and rehabilitation programs that have been shown to be more effective in reducing crime.
In conclusion, the death penalty should be abolished due to its ineffectiveness as a deterrent, its risk of error and injustice, its disproportionate impact on marginalized groups, and its high cost. There are more humane and effective alternatives to the death penalty that can be used to hold people accountable for their actions and protect society.
The Death Penalty: Should it be Abolished?
The death penalty should be abolished for many reasons. Even if our criminal justice system was flawless with no false convictions or bias of any sort, there would still be serious problems with using the death penalty. The death penalty violates the basic tenets of all religions and the inherent worth of all human lives. I doubt many Civic Issue blog authors — past or present, myself included — would immediately opt for such a topic, especially one as heavy and controversial as life or death, yet you did. If mistakes are made, capital punishment cannot be undone. While I believe the death penalty to be cruel and unusual, this argument has more subjectivity.
US death penalty must be abolished, rights experts urge President Biden
Therefore, in 1790, the Walnut Street Prison was built in Philadelphia, the primitive seed from which the American penal system emerged. In 1994, Congress passed the Federal Death Penalty Act, which added more than 50 crimes punishable by death; It also exempts persons with intellectual disabilities from the death penalty. Georgia, Louisiana, Missouri and South Carolina each executed one juvenile offender. On the one hand, the Eighth Amendment demands that sentencing discretion in capital cases be structured according to fixed, objective standards to eliminate arbitrariness and discrimination. Vote and tell us why. While the death penalty takes the physical life of the criminal, life without parole takes away any quality of life.
Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Scholarly Articles
When polling, support for the death penalty is considerably higher in online polls versus phone call polls. Britain was the biggest influence on America in terms of the death penalty. The Federal Government also prohibits the execution of mentally handicapped prisoners. The death penalty is incompatible with human rights and human dignity The death penalty violates the right to life which happens to be the most basic of all human rights. I learned that it cost half a million dollars to rightfully execute someone via capital punishment, and honestly that is what surprised me the most. There is also a big question of whether people would rather the defendant suffer in jail or get the death penalty. The arbitrary application of the death penalty can never be ruled out The death penalty is often used in a disproportional manner against the poor, minorities and members of racial, ethnic, political and religious groups.
Death penalty pros and cons: should it be abolished?
The full list of experts involved, is at the bottom of the press statement released by the human rights office, The Special Rapporteurs, Independent Experts and Working Groups are part of what is known as the. The death penalty is completely justified if someone commits a crime like murder, however, I believe that if someone does a little crime such as robbery, I believe prison time is reasonable. It does not render justice to victims, but instead fosters vengeance. The death penalty is not applied fairly across the country and those being sentenced to death are not dependent on the crime they committed but instead on where it was committed. This means that for the first time since capital punishment was reinstated, a majority of states have halted the death penalty either in law or in practice.
Do you think governments should be allowed to execute people convicted of crimes? The number of executions that have taken place each year in the 21st century is in double digits, although thousands of inmates are sentenced to death. I think it is crucial that nations around the world put pressure on countries like China. In many countries, it can be for act of terrorism or murder or even drug related crimes. Should the death penalty be abolished? After reading your blog post now, though, that has changed. The number of detainees killed then began to decline, falling to 20 in 2016.
However, there exist more effective ways to prevent crime. However, as you mentioned in your blog, it happens quite often when new evidence comes up and a person can be found innocent. The death penalty flies in the face of moral values, common sense, and history. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, December 2014. The state then passed a law in 1990 saying that we would no longer execute through electrocution but instead lethal injection.
However, even more shockingly, 183 people convicted and sentenced to the death penalty have been exonerated and then released from death row, meaning evidence later came out that they were innocent. Capital punishment fails to address the root cause of the crimes. There is no justice in snuffing out human life; it restores nothing, only destroys. In their appeal for concrete measures to halt the practice, the experts urged lawmakers to consider linking federal funding to alternative sentencing and banning the sale and transport of chemicals used in lethal injections. Pennsylvania had the third-highest number of executions of any state, conducting 1,040 executions. In the three districts Virginia, Texas, and eastern Missouri that accounted for the bulk of the federal death sentences at the time, most of the people on death row were people of color.