Section 306 indian penal code. Section 306 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 2022-10-22
Section 306 indian penal code Rating:
Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the offense of abetment of suicide. According to this section, whoever abets the commission of suicide, whether by actively inciting the person to commit suicide or by failing to take reasonable steps to prevent the person from committing suicide when they have the means and inclination to do so, shall be punished with imprisonment of up to 10 years and fine.
This section was introduced in the Indian Penal Code in the year 1860 and has undergone several amendments since then. The provision has been the subject of much debate and controversy, with some arguing that it is overly broad and can be misused to punish people who may not have had any intention of inciting suicide.
One of the main criticisms of this section is that it does not distinguish between different degrees of culpability. For example, a person who actively and intentionally incites another person to commit suicide may be punished in the same way as a person who fails to take reasonable steps to prevent suicide when they have the means and inclination to do so. This lack of differentiation can result in uneven and unjust punishments.
Another issue with this section is that it does not require the person to have had any direct communication with the person who committed suicide. This means that a person can be held liable for abetment of suicide even if they were not present at the time of the suicide and did not directly communicate with the person who committed suicide. This has led to cases where people have been held liable for abetment of suicide even though they had no direct involvement in the act.
Despite these criticisms, there is no denying that section 306 of the Indian Penal Code serves an important purpose. Suicides are a major public health issue in India, with over 1.4 million suicides reported in the country in 2019. By holding people accountable for their actions or inactions that contribute to the commission of suicide, this section helps to deter people from engaging in behavior that could lead to suicide.
In conclusion, while section 306 of the Indian Penal Code has faced criticism for its lack of differentiation between different degrees of culpability and its lack of a requirement for direct communication with the person who committed suicide, it serves an important purpose in addressing the issue of suicide in India. It is important that any amendments to this section are carefully considered to ensure that it is effective in deterring people from engaging in behavior that could lead to suicide while also being fair and just.
Section 306: Abetment of suicide
Till today, I have not spoken badly to any one but, however, if any mistake had been done by me to anybody, please forgive me. In order to get bail in such cases, an accused would require very strong reasons. It was held that while section 306 was not attracted in the case, guilt under section 498-A was established. There must be a clear intention to commit the offence of abetment for charging a person under Section 306 of IPC. The statement by his wife showed that he was a frustrated man and in the habit of drinking.
The provision there provides for the punishment of abetment of suicide as well as abetment of attempt to commit suicide. She, however, absolved her husband and other in-laws in her dying declaration but the other evidence conclusively proved everything. Harminder Singh says that on the day when the Mobile was stolen, he was taking the test. Court has given judgent that I have love affair with victim. Singh, the then Head of the Law Department on 13. Is section 309 of IPC repealed? Uttering of abuses will not amount to provocation to commit suicide and it does not constitute abetment and so no offence is made out under section 306.
. If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. A person facing criminal charges, such as mentioned under section 306, risks severe penalties and consequences, such as jail time, having a criminal record, and loss of relationships and future job prospects, among other things. Imprisonment for 10 years and fine. It also said that while adjudicating on such cases, the court of law should not be guided by emotions or sentiments but should rely on facts and evidence on record, Live Law reported.
He threatened to abduct her and engaged in constant eve-teasing, leading the girl to believe that death was a better alternative than living, and she has been left with little choice but to commit herself. The applicability of this provision is limited to only three main categories i. In Virendra Kumar v. For bail you should contact local lawyer and if dismissed by sessions court then go to high court. Decision of the Court The Supreme Court held that there must be evidence of either direct or indirect actions of instigation to the conduct of suicide in situations of alleged abetment of suicide.
There must also be a direct act, which induced the deceased person to commit suicide. Chheena, the Security Officer was not even named as an accused. Tenant of that room neither doing business nor signed room aggriment since 2009. In Sohan Raj Sharma v. Committing suicide is no more a crime in England after the coming into existence of the Suicides Act, 1961, but help and abetment in suicide are punishable. How to get Bail in Abetment of Suicide Case? State that if section 309 of the Indian Penal Code were to be held unconstitutional it is highly doubtful whether section 306 could survive, as self-killing is conceptually different from abetting others to kill themselves.
Why do you need a Lawyer? The Supreme Court held that the accused could not be convicted under section 306. The Court found no evidence on the record to support the conclusion that the victim who committed suicide was sensitive to ordinary childishness, conflict, and difference in home life that were prevalent in the community whereby the victim belonged. State of Punjab 2020 The judgement of Gurcharan Singh v. To convict a person under Section 306 of the IPC, there must be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. It was held that the conviction must be set aside and a composite sentence passed under sections 306 and 498-A should not have been passed under the facts and circumstances of the case. The constitutionality of Section 306 was examined in Naresh Morotrao v Union of India, and the court determined that Section 306 comprises an altogether separate offence. He is seriously aggrieved by the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar by which he had framed a charge against the appellant under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for short, IPC.
Issue of the case The main issue that was raised in this case was: Whether the scolding of the teacher is regarded as an abetment to suicide. They quarrelled over keeping her. State of Punjab, the wife died of poisoning within seven years of marriage. It was claimed by the applicant that, despite having transferred the entire purchase price of the vintage motorcycle to the deceased, the deceased failed to hand over ownership of the vintage motorcycle to the petitioner. Singh asked both the students, i. I am a student and has completed my studies but this case is obstructing me in getting job.
What is Section 306? Provision behind arrest of Tunisha Sharma’s co
Section 306 IPC case laws Gurcharan Singh v. What is the IPC for suicide? The State of Gujarat 2022 The judgement of Daxaben v. The commission of suicide should be fulfilled in order to hold the accused guilty as only an unfulfilled attempt to commit suicide is not punishable under this Section. The Supreme Court held the conviction of the accused under section 306 proper. In order to properly comprehend the scope and ambit of Section 306 IPC, it is important to carefully examine the basic ingredients of Section 306 IPC. What is Section 306 IPC Section 306 of the IPC talks about the abetment of suicide. Union of India has observed that it does not agree with the view of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Chenna Jagdeeswar v.
Chheena was a Security Officer at Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. How much it will take to quash?. The essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 IPC are: i the abetment; ii the intention of the accused to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide. The Supreme Court held that this by itself would not constitute instigation. Maltreatment of wife Simple examples of husband-and-wife quarrels or proof that the applicant used to drink alcohol at times cannot be considered abetment pursuant to section 107 IPC, 1860. They predicated the conviction on the principle that a young woman with two small children decided to commit suicide as a result of abusive behaviour in a matrimonial home, which was not backed by the evidence presented in the case.
State of West Bengal, a newly wedded girl died of poisoning within seven years of her marriage in her matrimonial home. In Mahendra Singh, the allegations levelled were as under: SCC p. Decision of the Court The Supreme Court stated that neither the Trial Court nor the High Court considered whether the appellant had mens rea to commit the offence for which he was found guilty. Where the accused persons did nothing to stop a widow who had declared her intention to commit sati, and in fact had actively associated with her by preparing the pyre and supplying her ghee which she poured over herself and the body of her husband, it was held that they were guilty under this section for abetting the widow to commit suicide and it was no defence to say that in view of the magical powers of the late husband they had believed that curse would fall upon them and so they were overawed and followed the orders of the widow. State 2009 is as follows: Facts of the case The deceased in this case committed suicide by shooting himself using his licenced pistol. An accusation under Section 306 is a very serious one.