Rifkin animal rights. “A Change of heart About Animals”, by Jeremy Rifkin Free Essay Example 2022-11-06
Rifkin animal rights Rating:
In his book "The Humane Economy," author Jeremy Rifkin argues that the animal rights movement has reached a pivotal point in history and is on the verge of achieving significant political and economic power. Rifkin believes that the animal rights movement is not just about protecting the welfare of individual animals, but about fundamentally rethinking our relationship with animals and the natural world.
At the heart of Rifkin's argument is the idea that animals, like humans, are sentient beings with their own unique experiences and feelings. He argues that we have a moral obligation to recognize and respect the inherent value of animal life and to treat animals with the same compassion and consideration that we would want for ourselves.
Rifkin points out that the animal rights movement has made significant progress in recent years, with many companies and governments adopting more humane practices in areas such as factory farming, cosmetics testing, and animal entertainment. However, he also notes that there is still much work to be done in terms of protecting the rights of animals and promoting their welfare.
One of the key challenges facing the animal rights movement, according to Rifkin, is the lack of legal protections for animals. In many cases, animals are still treated as mere property, with no legal standing or rights of their own. Rifkin calls for a fundamental shift in our laws and cultural attitudes towards animals, recognizing their inherent value and granting them the same legal protections as humans.
Rifkin also argues that the animal rights movement has the potential to bring about significant economic and social change. He points out that the animal agriculture industry is one of the largest contributors to environmental degradation and climate change, and that a shift towards plant-based and humanely-raised animal products could have a significant impact on the planet. Additionally, Rifkin believes that the animal rights movement can help to promote more compassionate and humane societies, where all beings are treated with respect and dignity.
In conclusion, Rifkin's "The Humane Economy" makes a compelling case for the importance of the animal rights movement and the need to fundamentally rethink our relationship with animals. Through legal and cultural changes, and a shift towards more humane and sustainable practices, Rifkin believes that we can create a world where all beings are treated with the respect and compassion they deserve.
Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Essay
Animal emotions are, indeed, important. This can lead to the development of medications that are ineffective or even harmful to humans. Personally, I do believe what Rifkin said is true, I agree that animals are more like us then we thought. In Germany, the government is encouraging pig farmers to give each pig 20 seconds of human contact every day and to provide them with two or three toys to prevent them fighting. Today, Harvard and 25 other law schools in the US have introduced law courses on animal rights, and an increasing number of cases representing the rights of animals are entering the court system.
The definition of culture means the ability to communicate, to use tools to make life easier, and to have some notion of mortality and the passing of time. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Type of paperEssay Any Type SubjectCreative Writing Number of pages2 Format of citationMLA Number of cited resources1 Type of serviceWriting Compose an Analytical Research Paper - Animal rights has been a controversial topic for many years. Fox hunting in England, bull-fighting in Spain, cock-fighting in Mexico? Playing the blame game will not bring Harambe back and for me the real question, while also considering why Harambe was killed, is… Controversial Topic People have different feelings for animals; many look at them as long life companions and others see them as test subjects to further their studies in medical or experimental research. Researchers were stunned recently by findings published in the journal Science on the conceptual abilities of New Caledonian crows. Critics of animal testing argue that it is cruel and inhumane to subject animals to procedures that may cause them pain, suffering, or even death. Everyone needs to know that animals aren't some type of toy but rather a living creature with feelings.
Today, animal right is a highly contentious issue. In a very similar matter, they both have common characteristics that relate to one another. Additionally, testing on plants produces even less accurate results in relation to humans than tests done using monkeys or other mammals. Although many believe animals have no feelings,animals should have the same protection rights as humans because they are living things, are able to feel pain, and are not our sources of entertainment. As Rifkin brings up the research that a good portion of animals are social beings that often participate with their young in their own learning experience, he raises several questions to induce thought unto the reader.
“A Change of heart About Animals”, by Jeremy Rifkin Free Essay Example
If we are to extend empathy to animals, then we must also accept that they will do the same to us. The monkeys were given branches, hidden food, and a rotation of toys to promote neurogenesis. At least, 12 - 14,000 years ago, people realized that if they took a baby wolf, they could train it, and it would be friendly when the wolf was full grown. The pig study only scratches the surface of what is going on in the field of research into animal emotions and cognitive abilities. I strongly disagree in giving animal more rights than some humans worldwide do not have. For instance, Rifkin uses pathos in his writing to get emotional feedback from the reader; he makes the reader feel some sort of guilt or pity for the animals.
An Argument in Favor of Jeremy Rifkin's Take on Animal Rights
We need them for their meat and their fur. Since the definition of ethics is having well-founded standards of right and wrong, this process of producing meat for our consumption is unethical. He gives many examples on how some animals are human like emotion and skilled wise. However, I liked even more how he also took others into consideration by not including an extreme call to action like everyone becoming vegetarian or vegan. Rifkin develops his thesis by comparing the similarities between humans and animals. If the United States government itself is making laws banning the abuse of specific animals, along with creating and implementing laws that promote their goodwill and being, then surely it must be a cause that is worth the taxpayers readers money to be funded into.
Discussing Jeremy Rifkin's Thoughts on Animal Rights: [Essay Example], 635 words GradesFixer
There is also lots of science that leads me to believe animals are just like us. Based on my research and discussions with scientists, it appears likely that at least some great apes, cetaceans, and elephants possess cognitive abilities that the Nonhuman Rights Project believes are sufficient for legal personhood. Singer starts shows equity by explaining how decency does not require measures up to rights. There has been problems with animal testing in the past because humans do not react the same as animals to a product. Germany recently became the first nation to guarantee animal rights in its constitution.
There are many other ways to stop the cruelty from spreading, yet not many people are willing to take the chance to stop it. No matter how many humans we overpopulate, we will always must always share this one and only Earth with these animals. This evolutionary concept even takes place in the animal kingdom, one must hunt and kill for survival. He makes this claim by first acknowledging how Jeremy Rifkin's A Change Of Heart About Animals 969 Words 4 Pages We are not alone on this Earth. Studies on pigs' social behaviour at Purdue University in the US, for example, have found that they crave affection and are easily depressed if isolated or denied playtime with each other. Farmers are not doing there job to their full potential.
Discussing Jeremy Rifkin's Thoughts on Animal Rights
Daniel Engster received his PhD from the University of Chicago and is a professor in the Political Science department at the University of Texas in San Antonio. No one wants cats to have the right to vote, or for dogs to have the right to bear arms. We should extend compassion to them, but not at the expense of our own kind. Both chose the hooked wire. In my opinion, animals are inferior to us and humans will always use them for our needs. They tested multiple types of animals, but with all of the animals they wanted to have them in enclosures resembling their natural habitat, because this would cause them to behave and grow as they normally would. Rifkin, Jeremy Rifkin writes an incredible article which is warm hearting and does not go over the top.
It is basically survival of the fittest. This means that new treatments and cures developed through animal testing may not work in humans. One of these activists is Jeremy Rifkin, who is an economic theorist. Animals have helped us develop cures for diseases and create new medical technologies. There are only roughly 700 gorillas in the world today and can only be found alive in three countries of Central Africa: Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, and Uganda. Worst …show more content… One of his main examples is Koko the gorilla. Animals have culture too.
This would not only help to improve the treatment of animals, but it would also help to change the way we think about them. Suggestions:- Review your reading and writing entries in your reflection journal. These differences lead people to emphasize different elements of animal welfare that can be summarized under three broad headings Fraser, 2008. Humans live in a world of affection, where emotions and self moral rights matter. Animal testing can take a long time, which delays the release of new treatments and cures to the market. The solution to this conflict according to the author who supports friendly farms that respect and give a fun and secure life for animals.