Least preferred coworker theory. Fiedler Contingency Model 2022-10-20
Least preferred coworker theory Rating:
6,6/10
1015
reviews
The least preferred coworker theory, also known as the LPC theory, is a theory in social psychology that explains how individuals perceive and evaluate their relationships with others in a work setting. It was first introduced by psychologist Fred Fiedler in the 1960s as a way to understand the effectiveness of leadership styles in different types of work environments.
According to the LPC theory, an individual's perception of their least preferred coworker (LPC) is a good predictor of their leadership style and effectiveness. The LPC is defined as the person with whom the individual has had the least satisfying interpersonal relationship, and is typically thought of as the individual's "worst" coworker.
Fiedler believed that individuals with a high LPC score (meaning they had a more negative perception of their least preferred coworker) were more effective leaders in situations where there was little control over the work environment, such as in emergency situations or when working with highly skilled or motivated employees. On the other hand, individuals with a low LPC score (meaning they had a more positive perception of their least preferred coworker) were more effective leaders in situations where there was more control over the work environment, such as in structured or predictable work environments.
The LPC theory has been widely studied and has been found to be a useful tool for predicting leadership effectiveness in a variety of work settings. However, it is important to note that the LPC theory is just one factor that can influence an individual's leadership style and effectiveness, and that other factors such as personality, experience, and situational factors can also play a role.
Overall, the least preferred coworker theory is a useful tool for understanding how individuals perceive and evaluate their relationships with others in a work setting, and how this can influence their leadership style and effectiveness.
Least
Now, working with a Least Preferred Coworker Test Online takes not more than 5 minutes. They dislike conflict and are motivated to break down barriers to closeness. The LPC score is then computed by totaling all the ratings. The questionnaire can be used to predict a person's effectiveness as a leader, and it can also be used to match people with appropriate leadership roles. Try outlining tasks to make them easier for your team to accomplish.
For example, a leader with a task-oriented style would be more effective in a situation where the task is clear and the followers are motivated. Relationships, power and task structure are the three key factors that drive effective styles. A high LPC sees positive qualities even in the co- worker she or he least prefers, even though the high LPC does not work well with that person. Fred Edward Fiedler 1922-2017 was born in Vienna, Austria. These particular stocks give stockholders a priority in distributions of earnings and assets in the event of liquidation. Many employs believe the communication and mutual work with these people are impossible, but, in actuality, it is necessary to learn how to deal with difficult people. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Least Preferred Coworker and Four Factor Theory of Leadership: Scales Analysis and Conceptual Relationships on JSTOR
In fact, delegation is necessary for effective leadership. He agreed to do every tasks that team leader gave to. The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. To measure one's style by assessing another person's style does not make sense. Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important.
These emphasis by researchers led to theories about leadership. The favorability of a situation depends on how much influence and power you have as a leader. But people who are indeed relationship motivated, tend to describe their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner, e. The leader of each work group included in a study completes an LPC questionnaire to measure the leader's leadership style and orientation. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. It is based on the premise that there are four key areas of leadership development: technical skills, interpersonal skills, conceptual skills, and strategic skills. After you have selected this individual, the LPC instrument asks you to describe your coworker on 18 sets of adjectives.
Both coaches are matched well with their situation. B Matching the leader's styles with that of the group and organization. B Suggest changes to make in a lower-level position for a good manager-worker fit. Task structure refers to the clarity of the tasks required to complete a project. B Good leader-member relations, low structure, weak power. Position power is strong if: A Leader has the authority to hire and fire followers.
Fiedlerâs Contingency Theory: Summary with Examples
Remove the routine and make documents on the web! The following section will walk you through how to determine your natural leadership style and understand the situation at hand. They attend to interpersonal relationships, but only after they first have directed themselves toward the tasks of the group. The scale has been found to be a reliable and valid measure of an individual's interpersonal style. They are individuals whose primary needs are to accomplish tasks and whose secondary needs are focused on getting along with people. When a leader is said to have cognitive ability What does it typically indicate? Managers must make sure people with a strong need for affiliation work with a group of people. In this respect, it is possible to refer to D.
Situational contingency theory, also known as situational leadership, states that every situation that requires leadership is different and requires a specific type of leader. During a speech given by your department director, he repeatedly emphasizes the importance of reaching goals set by the organization. The least preferred coworker LPC theory, developed by Fred E. When I approach working with others and subordinates, I really do wait to see their performance before I decide if I like them. The more they do, the higher your degree of leader-member relations and the more favorable the situation is. Remember, understanding your leadership style is highly beneficial to you and your team.
Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept. If the leader scored the LPC very low largely negative rating then the leader is task oriented. D Poor leader-member relations, high structure, weak power. B Task-motivated leaders are good in moderately favorable settings. As a result of this work, Fiedler has become known as a key contributor to the field of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. High LPCs are more motivated by tasks.
What does Fiedler's least preferred coworker questionnaire measure? A True B False 30. According to Contingency theory, which best describes your director? E Followers have an unknown role within situational leadership. Regardless of ones personal orientation, effective communication has key elements, which is accountability, professional, brief and sincere Marques, 2010. But people who are indeed relationship motivated, tend to describe their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner, e. D The traits of the leader as they directly relate to those of the followers.
