Gun control argumentative essay thesis. Argumentatives Of Gun Control 2022-10-09
Gun control argumentative essay thesis
Gun control is a controversial and divisive issue in the United States. On one side of the debate, there are those who argue that gun ownership is a fundamental right protected by the Second Amendment and that stricter gun control measures would infringe upon this right. On the other side, there are those who believe that the widespread availability of firearms is a major contributing factor to gun violence and that stricter gun control measures are necessary to protect public safety.
In this argumentative essay, I will take the position that stricter gun control measures are necessary to protect public safety and reduce gun violence. I will begin by outlining the current state of gun control in the United States and the various arguments made by both sides of the debate. I will then present evidence to support my argument that stricter gun control measures would be effective in reducing gun violence and will address some of the most common counterarguments made by opponents of gun control.
To begin with, it is important to understand the current state of gun control in the United States. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was adopted in 1791, states that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment has been interpreted in various ways over the years, with some arguing that it guarantees an individual right to gun ownership and others arguing that it was intended to protect the right of states to maintain militias.
Despite the debate over the meaning of the Second Amendment, there are already a number of federal and state laws in place that regulate gun ownership and use. These laws include background check requirements for gun purchases, restrictions on certain types of firearms and accessories, and age and mental health restrictions for gun ownership. However, these laws vary significantly from state to state and are often subject to interpretation and legal challenge.
One of the main arguments made by opponents of stricter gun control measures is that gun ownership is a fundamental right protected by the Second Amendment. According to this argument, any attempt to regulate or restrict gun ownership would be a violation of this right and would be unconstitutional. Opponents of gun control also argue that gun ownership is an important means of self-defense and that stricter gun control measures would leave law-abiding citizens defenseless against criminals.
On the other hand, proponents of stricter gun control measures argue that the widespread availability of firearms is a major contributing factor to gun violence in the United States. According to this argument, the high number of gun-related deaths and injuries in the United States is a result of the relatively easy access to firearms, especially among individuals who should not have them due to age, mental health issues, or criminal history.
There is a significant amount of evidence to support the argument that stricter gun control measures would be effective in reducing gun violence. A number of studies have found that countries with stricter gun control laws tend to have lower rates of gun-related deaths and injuries. For example, a 2018 study published in the American Journal of Medicine found that countries with stricter gun control laws had significantly lower rates of gun-related homicides and suicides compared to countries with less stringent laws.
Another argument often made by opponents of gun control is that stricter gun control measures would not be effective in reducing gun violence because criminals will always be able to obtain firearms illegally. While it is true that some criminals will be able to obtain guns illegally, stricter gun control measures can still be effective in reducing gun violence by making it more difficult for criminals to obtain firearms and by reducing the overall number of guns in circulation.
In conclusion, stricter gun control measures are necessary to protect public safety and reduce gun violence in the United States. While the right to gun ownership is protected by the Second Amendment, this right is not absolute and can be regulated in the interest of public safety. There is a
Gun Control Argumentative Essay Thesis
If gun control is regulated, then we will have less crime. Each chapter is filled with facts that pertain to the research conducted by the many contributors. All of these laws and regulations helped and prevented many mistakes that could have happened if there were no gun control in the world. This should be discouraged by adequate training and in depth cross examination. Indeed, there are several legitimate restrictions on gun ownership. . So therefore the prohibition of guns or stricter laws on gun control is unconstitutional and not morally correct.
Sample Argumentative Essays On Gun Control Laws In Texas
Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives. . Gun control has only raised conflict in the United States, in Washington D. Wolpert and Gimpel declare that by implementing gun control measures, the government is using coercive power to directly shape individual conduct 241. This means that even if the country is made to adhere to some stringent moves, as long as the borders are porous from surprise visits from incoming international hosts, this shows that the situation is at a critical stage. A high percentage of such homicides are people who are licensed to own a gun.
Argumentative Paper About Gun Control Argumentative Essays
The serialization should be attached to persons issued with the guns and ammunitions. I researched other viewpoints about this complicated controversial topic. Gun restrictions ignore the fact that guns have many legitimate users such as sporting and hunting. Legal scholars refute this claim by stating that the Second Amendment protected the right of the individual to possess firearms. Over the years, this vice has been on the steady rise; both in Texas and the neighbouring Mexico country. Parliament keeps on discussing this issue year in and year out, but has never settled on what facts say about embracing such laws.
Free Example Of Gun Control Argumentative Essay
There should be proper regularization on the usage of such weapons. Going back to the idea that the government could take away all the firearms from civilians, we have to face the fact that even that would not protect anyone. For example, the nation stands to lose a lot in terms of revenue collected since it is taxable and a source of income to the system. However, if an individual with a mental challenge, depressed, psychopath, or delusional out of personal or religious affiliations, any weapon is lethal in their hands. There is no question this is a complicated issue that will require a complicated answer.
Thesis For Gun Control Essay
Learn More Conclusion This paper set out to argue that gun control is an infringement upon the most basic of rights or American citizens and the government should not be empowered to control guns. Going along with the shootings, assassinations were rising too. It will be a long journey involving the personal choices of individuals and families, public discussions, mental health reforms, a change in the culture — you name it. It was a bad idea to choose this topic The Right to Bear Arms Essay agree that the government should have that right. In addition, it provided money for new prisons, police, and crime-stopping programs. Young people often commit serious crimes if they found access to gun and weaponry. This law became effective in 1917 and caused organized crime growth in the cities.
Gun Control Thesis
The right to own a gun should be highly restricted. Instead, it would put many people in danger. In Berman, Eric G. By stopping its attempts at gun control, the government will not only be upholding the constitutional rights of its citizens but it will also ensure that the citizens are able to enjoy the benefits that firearms bring to the individual and the society at large. History has become witness to the harmful effects of irresponsible gun handling, particularly when it comes to crime.
Gun Control Argumentative Essays
Most of the 23 executive orders will not serve any purpose except to increase tax spending and wasting resources and manpower on an ill-directed initiative. The proposition is this: the country creates laws that control gun retailing and manufacturing in order to prevent a majority of gun related crimes and accidents. Depending on its uses, guns could either be helpful or destructive, hence the reason why regulations for gun ownership are essential inclusions in any contemporary legal systems. The President of the United States of America has stated categorically and with all vehemence available that, there is need to have stringent measures set in as far as civilian owning guns is concerned. The right to a gun does not necessarily mean you can do whatever you want with it even taking the life of your family members. The Second Amendment gives the people the right to bear arms and people often interpret this as the government is unable to interfere with the law unless there have been other legal challenges to that Amendment.
An Argument against Gun Control
Gun Control In America Essay 1192 Words 5 Pages As the lives of seventeen students were taken away this valentine's day, in the most recent school shooting at Douglas High School, great controversy has erupted on the topic of gun control in America. It is important to highlight at this juncture that the main reason for negation of the ideology that gun control is the ultimate solution to the emergent menace is that, security of a region is important, but most importantly is the security of the neighborhood. The militia on their side will always keep track of person licensed hence they can easily get hold of these guns and use them to commit crime Kevin 51. There is a higher proclivity that the individuals who were met with hair are those that based on the amount savings in their accounts and the accounting information; they were the targets Cerdá et al. The Columbine High School massacre is the basis behind the film and Moore shows that the culture of guns in the US has ruined the fabric of this society. I agree with those that believed obtaining guns is a way to keep yourself and your loved ones safe.
Gun Control Argumentative Essay Examples That Really Inspire
I started off my essay implying that I was pro-gun and having possession of a gun is necessary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Guns are directly related to the chaos. Josh Sugarmann, the Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center has once said, "We recoil in horror and search for explanations, but we never face up to the obvious preventive measure: a ban on the handy killing machines that make crimes so easy. It has caused a great divide among people as one sector of society believes and endorses the use of firearms, while another division pushes for. . We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons.