Death penalty is revenge not justice. Death Penalty: A means of revenge or punishment? 2022-10-17
Death penalty is revenge not justice
Rating:
5,9/10
1778
reviews
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the practice of sentencing individuals to death for certain crimes. While it has been used throughout history as a form of punishment, the modern death penalty is a controversial and divisive issue that raises fundamental questions about justice, human rights, and the role of the state in society.
One argument against the death penalty is that it is fundamentally wrong to take a human life, regardless of the circumstances. This view is rooted in the belief that all human life is inherently valuable and that the state has no right to take a life, even in cases where the person has committed a heinous crime. This belief is based on the idea that all humans have inherent dignity and are deserving of respect, regardless of their actions.
Another argument against the death penalty is that it is not an effective deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the death penalty does not significantly reduce the incidence of violent crime, and some have even argued that it may have the opposite effect by serving as a rallying cry for those who oppose the state's use of lethal force.
Furthermore, the death penalty is often applied disproportionately to certain groups, such as people of color and those who are economically disadvantaged. This can lead to a system of justice that is perceived as biased and unfair, further undermining public confidence in the justice system.
Ultimately, the death penalty can be seen as an act of revenge, rather than justice. While it may offer some sense of closure for victims and their families, it does not address the root causes of crime or provide any real solutions to the problems that lead to criminal behavior. In contrast, alternatives such as restorative justice and rehabilitation offer the opportunity for healing and transformation, both for the offender and the community.
In conclusion, the death penalty is a complex and controversial issue that raises fundamental questions about justice, human rights, and the role of the state in society. While it may be tempting to seek revenge through capital punishment, it ultimately does not serve the cause of justice or address the underlying issues that lead to crime. Instead, we should consider alternatives that offer the opportunity for healing and transformation, both for the offender and the community.
Victims' Families
Under the plain language of the rule itself, therefore, I would not hold Dow in contempt for filing pleadings only thirty minutes late under circumstances in which this Court still had essentially seven days to consider the pleadings. It was years, no, decades ago. That morning the U. Support Our Journalism India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. Right now, those people devote resources to fighting the death penalty. It revolves around moral correction in situations where certain ethical and culturally vital principles have been violated. Hakamada had expressed his disquiet at how the state is out to kill its own citizens and how that is completely unsupportable.
Next
Revenge is not Justice
In addition, the judicial system has severe bias and discrimination built into it which leads to false sentencing, allowing innocent victims to find themselves on death row. It makes no more sense for the government to possess and encourage those attitudes. If I or a member of my family commits heinous crimes against others and it is proved with all evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt, then the sentence should be the same. They try to get states to outlaw it, they pay for the legal defense of people on death row, they participate in protests, etc. My son, my monster, my fault.
Next
Donât Confuse Revenge With Justice: Five Key Differences
GROG Like Like Executions are justice. If I could take it back, I would do that in a second. Earlier this month, she wa As an Arizona jury resumes deliberating on Wednesday about whether she deserves the death penalty for the murder of her ex-boyfriend, Jodi Arias is now begging for her life after initially saying she preferred to die. That is, bloodthirstiness has no partâor should have no partâin precepts of justice, at least not in the way the term is presently employed. No one is born a criminal or a rapist or a murderer, it is society and its miseducation that turn people towards criminality. In this country, many have been retried based on new evodence, or just released based on prosecutorial malfensense keeping possible exculpatory evidence away from the defense.
Next
Death penalty fosters revenge, not justice, pope says
Some can negotiate and skirt this systematic miseducation while some cannot. Justice system isn't fair. Can nobody be proven guilty? The driving impetus behind revenge is to get even, to carry out a private vendetta, or to achieve what, subjectively, might be described as personal justice. But what about those where there is absolutely no doubt that they committed the crime? Francis echoed the church's teaching, calling on conference participants to also work toward improving prison conditions "so that they fully respect the human dignity of those incarcerated" and promote the rehabilitation of convicts. Christ, how does a parent come back from that? They say the opponents would want to take revenge by having the murderer executed.
Next
The death penalty: revenge doesnât equal justice
There is no point blaming only the criminal if we cannot place equal blame on these intervening factors. The system arbitrarily targets those of poor socio-economic status, racial minorities, and those with developmental disabilities; some of those disabilities include pyschotic disorders such as schizophrenia and severe bipolar disorder. Certain crimes, like murder, don't really have a non-violent equivalent. Death penalty thus often succeeds in instilling the required terror for quelling crimes. In the course of history, the two have been frequently used interchangeably.
Next
The death penalty is about revenge not justice. : unpopularopinion
There have been many instances where people have spent a number of years in jail as punishment for their crimes and turned over a new leaf or dedicated themselves to the betterment of society. It's a flat action. Moreover, the victims of revenge and their supporters often develop bitterness and a desire to strike back. They tell them that their anger and sorrow will be allayed when the state imposes capital punishment on the murderer. If the execution is eventually carried out, many of those families find it to be a severe disappointment, particularly in terms of improving their emotional state.
Next
Jodi Arias: Death penalty would be 'revenge,' not justice
And doubtless, revenge has borne the brunt of the various semantic changes that have transpired. Each faction say, Israel and Palestine has its own agenda, its own sense of right and wrong. We would like to believe we are past that, however, to a certain extent, we are not. How does killing the killer ever provide closure for those family members? Justice does not come to mind when the flawed justice system promotes social inequalities when life and death are on the line, a matter far deeper than race. Finally, this Note ultimately asserts that revenge is not and should not be a goal of the criminal justice system given the public policy implications. She was sentenced to death and has been languishing in prison ever since.
Next
Has Revenge Become a Justification to Legitimize the Death Penalty?
Death has been prescribed in Rape cases since 2013, and yet the brutality and number of cases are rising manifold in the country. For those on death row, who were convicted before DNA evidence was possible, alter the sentence to life. It would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for these individuals on death row to find competent counsel to aid them in their cases at this point. To kill is to eliminate any possibility of correcting a mistake. And it prevents any possibility of undoing a possible miscarriage of justice," he said. There are instances when revenge can legitimately be understood as a type of justice, and justice a kind of revenge. Does capital punishment reduce crimes? It can only deprive them of the opportunity for forgiveness and reconciliation that is needed for the healing process.
Next
David Dow suspended by Texas court: Death penalty defense lawyerâs conflicts with appeals court.
He argued that the justice system continues to be targeting certain groups of people, and is especially unfair to people of color. It's the same reason we have innocent sex offenders and people serving life. The more we all know about this practice, the better, and the more minds that can be changed. Use of the death penalty is an unacceptable practice that sows vengeance and does not bring justice to the victims of crime, Pope Francis said. Feel free to use the Politics Megathread pinned to the front page.
Next
Death Penalty: A means of revenge or punishment?
There are people that have committed horrific crimes, but does putting them to death resolve anything for society in general or for the families that have suffered? It is this mentality that compels an arrogant and muscle-bound masculinist outlook to commit rapes. Apart from its expenses and its lack of apparent societal improvements, the death penalty postulates the concept of justice while being explicitly unjust and biased, particularly to people of color. . Justice, in contrast, is designed by individuals or officials generally not linked to the two opposing camps to offer a resolution far more likely to eventuate in closureâespecially if, in fact, it is just equitable. Meera Bhattacharya, the wife of then chief minister of West Bengal Buddhadeb Bhattacharya, had spearheaded a vociferous campaign for his death penalty ably aided by the media.
Next